Uphold Said CredEarn Was Safe. The Yield Came From Unbanked Gamers in China

The platform promoted CredEarn as a safe savings product. The money was funding microloans to unbanked gamers in China. Cred went bankrupt. Users lost everything.

New York AG Letitia James forced crypto platform Uphold to pay over $5 million for promoting CredEarn, a yield product that collapsed when its operator Cred filed for bankruptcy in November 2020. The settlement goes directly to affected customers. It is more than five times the fees Uphold collected from the arrangement.

The product funded microloans to gamers with no credit history

Between January 2019 and October 2020, Uphold marketed CredEarn on its platform and mobile app as a reliable savings product with attractive annual interest. What users did not know: Cred was generating those returns by issuing microloans to low-income video game players in China. Borrowers with no credit history, no access to traditional banks. That was the yield source.

Uphold also told customers that Cred carried โ€œcomprehensive insurance.โ€ The AGโ€™s office found that claim to be false. No insurance product covering retail investors from digital asset losses existed in the industry at the time. Not from Cred, not from anyone.

Cred started losing money from its lending book in March 2020. Eight months later it filed for bankruptcy. Thousands of Uphold users globally were left holding nothing.

$5 million to users, plus whatever comes from bankruptcy

The settlement structure is straightforward. Uphold pays $5 million directly to affected customers. Any funds Uphold recovers from Credโ€™s ongoing bankruptcy proceedings, where it is owed $545,189, will also be passed on. Users will be notified by email when the money hits their accounts.

The AGโ€™s office also flagged that Uphold was operating without the required broker or commodity broker-dealer registration during the period it promoted CredEarn. That is a separate compliance failure on top of the misleading marketing.

James is running up the enforcement score

This is not an isolated action. Last month New York sued Coinbase and Gemini, claiming their prediction market offerings violated state gambling laws. The CFTC fired back by suing New York in federal court, arguing sole authority over prediction markets. James has also been vocal on WLFI, saying prediction markets cannot ignore state consumer protection laws.

The pattern is clear. New Yorkโ€™s AG office is treating crypto enforcement as a priority heading into the midterm election cycle. Whether you read that as consumer protection or political positioning depends on your priors. The $5 million going to actual users is harder to argue with.

The CredEarn case is also a reminder. Every yield product in crypto has a source. If the platform will not tell you what it is, that is your answer.

Disclaimer The information provided on Coingo.net is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency investments are highly volatile and involve risk. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, some details may change over time. Always conduct your own research before making any financial decisions.